Las veg<span id="more-1992"></span>as, nevada Sands Accused of ‘Sabotage’ in Sands Asia CEO Steven Jacobs Case

Steven Jacobs, former CEO of Sands Asia, accuses LVS of circumvention and ‘improper and illegal maneuvering’ in the longstanding termination that is wrongful between the two parties.

Nevada Sands (LVS) was accused of employing delaying tactics in its ongoing spat that is legal former Sands Asia CEO Steven Jacobs.

Jacobs, that is suing his former employer for wrongful termination, filed an emergency motion last week in an attempt to stop any more circumvention from LVS in a situation that has stretched on for five years.

Jacobs’ attorney Tod Brice accused LVS of attempting to ‘sabotage his [client’s] legal rights to test’ by over and over repeatedly searching for to delay the procedures through ‘improper and illegal maneuvering.’

Jacobs sued LVS and its CEO Sheldon Adelson right after he was fired this year. He claims he was dismissed for ‘for blowing the whistle on improprieties and placing the passions of shareholders above those of Adelson.’

These improprieties include, based on Jacobs, alleged business deals with triad figures, as well as bribes to officials that are chinese.

Meanwhile, Adelson has accused Jacobs of trying to blackmail the ongoing company, and of ‘squealing such as for instance a pig to your government.’ He claims the China that is former Sands was fired for no other reason than ‘incompetency.’

Media Circus

Jacob’s motion is a response to LVS’ attempt last week to have the truth reassigned to a different judge, the next time the company’s lawyers have requested reassignment.

LVS said that ‘recent intensified media coverage of the lawsuit’ provided ‘new grounds’ for requesting present judge Elizabeth Gonzalez’s disqualification.

‘After years of apparent silence, the court has responded to that media coverage by adding to the coverage,’ it said. ‘ That participation raises doubts about the court’s impartiality and objectivity.’

The media protection in question surrounds Adelson’s controversial purchase of the nevada Review-Journal, and the truth that fleetingly before that acquisition was finalized, top brass at the paper demanded that R-J reporters drop every thing to monitor three Nevada judges, one of whom was Gonzalez.

Schroeder Scandal

An article criticizing Gonzalez later appeared in a tiny Connecticut magazine owned by Michael Schroeder, the man hired to handle News + Media Capital Group, the business hastily included by Adelson to run the Review-Journal.

‘From at least November 30, 2015, until the day that is present this case has been the subject of saturated media coverage prompted by way of a improvement in ownership for the Las Vegas Review-Journal, which includes no bearing on the quality of Steven C. Jacobs’s declare that he had been wrongfully ended from work in Macau in July 2010,’ states the LVS motion.

Gonzalez reacted that she had neither ‘a bias toward [n]or prejudice against’ LVS. While she acknowledged that she had responded to two media needs relating to the events surrounding the R-J purchase, one from TIME Magazine and another from the Review-Journal itself, she ‘did not discuss a particular litigant or case.’

Caesars Working Unit Bankruptcy Delays Have Actually Judge in a Thumbs Down Mood

Caesars Entertainment’s failure to convince its junior creditors to accept its reorganization plans could spell disaster for the gaming operator, warns Judge Benjamin Goldgar. (Image: reviewjournal.com)

The judge in the Caesars unit that is operating proceedings appears to be losing patience utilizing the casino giant.

US Bankruptcy Court Judge Benjamin Goldgar has warned that Caesars’ main operating unit, CEOC, could possibly be forced into liquidation, an outcome, he implied, that might also afford him a small degree of pleasure.

The source regarding the judge that is good irritation is the video gaming operator’s persistent efforts to block the findings of a court-appointed examiner’s investigation into the organization’s pre-bankruptcy tasks.

Caesars is involved in a litigious squabble with its junior creditors over its efforts to restructure some $18 billion with debt by putting CEOC through Chapter 11 proceedings. The junior creditors claim the reorganization process prefers major creditors at their own expense, and also allege that a number of CEOC’s assets were fraudulently transported to Caesars Entertainment and other subsidiaries for the advantage of its controlling equity that is private.

This, they argue, kept CEOC with distressed assets and an inability to cover its debts, while placing its most effective assets from the reach regarding the junior creditors.

Seven Million Pages Blocked

Last week, information surfaced indicating that Caesars is sitting on some seven million pages of the investigation, since it considers them confidential or privileged documents, news that has been greeted with measured exasperation by the judge.

‘It does not have to end with a confirmed plan,’ stated Goldgar, of CEOC’s near future. ‘a trustee could be appointed, the full case could be dismissed or, my favorite, the case could be converted to Chapter 7 [liquidation], which would just be considered a hoot, would not it?’

‘ The centerpiece of this case was supposed to be the examiner’s report. We’ve all been waiting,’ he complained. ‘This was what would definitely blow the logjam up.’

‘ You can’t have it both ways,’ Goldgar continued. ‘You can’t have a bankruptcy situation rely upon an [examination] and ask that everyone be patient although the examiner does all this work and then, regarding the concept that the report will then enable everybody to walk away smiling, holding hands … object to your release in the grounds of privilege.’

Beware the Ides of March

Goldgar has given Caesars until March 15 to persuade its junior creditors to accept its new debt reorganization plan, beyond which it will lose control of its bankruptcy proceedings entirely.

March fifteenth, of course, was understood to ancient Romans as the Ides of March, the date that is infamous of original Julius Caesar’s assassination, suggesting, maybe, that the judge has a wicked feeling of humor.

For Caesars Entertainment’s operating arm, the date can be life-threatening serious. Last week, the latest York Post quoted sources claiming that the examiner’s investigation sides with the creditors and so it has found ‘a degree of civil fraud’ in the company’s pre-bankruptcy transactions.

If real, this could potentially lead to proceedings that are criminal users associated with the Caesars board, in addition to the Nevada Gaming Control Board might initiate a study of the business’s suitability to hold a gambling license in the state.

Failure for both events to achieve a contract, then, could lead to ‘rather a turn that is different usually the one that I imagine the debtor and its particular parent and its affiliates would like to see,’ warned the judge.

Super Bowl 50 Betting Odds: Carolina Panthers Favored Over Denver Broncos

Carolina Panthers quarterback Cam Newton, left, will likely be vying for his NFL that is first title when he faces Peyton Manning together with Denver Broncos in Super Bowl 50 on February 7. (Image: Streeter Lecka/Ezra Shaw/Getty Images)

Super Bowl 50 is shaping up to feature the longest chances because the 2010 game. Ironically, Peyton Manning also participated in that Super Bowl, XLVIII, but was on the preferred part of the spread in comparison with being the underdog in 2016.

The line that is current in Las Vegas has Cam Newton and the Carolina Panthers (16-1) as a 4.5-point favorite over Manning’s Denver Broncos (14-4) when the two meet on February 7 at Levi’s Stadium in Santa Clara, California.

Several bookmakers have actually https://casino-online-australia.net/club-player-casino-review/ the Panthers in a lot more of the preferred role, aided by the MGM Mirage and Stations both giving the Broncos five points. The over/under for the overall game is 45.5, meaning the bettor needs to decide whether or not the two teams combined will score just about than that quantity.

The Panthers’ high-powered offense scored 49 points on a unique last Sunday up against the Arizona Cardinals in the NFC Championship game, but the Broncos come to California with all the defense that is best into the NFL. The matchup could be one for the many years.

According to ESPN’s energy Football Index, a forecast tool that uses a group’s performance and 10,000 simulations, the Panthers will win by 1.8 points and claim their Vince Lombardi that is first Trophy. ‘Get ready for a classic, with the Panthers squeaking after dark Broncos,’ ESPN’s Scott Miller wrote.

Super Bowl, Super Betting

More cash happens to be wagered in the usa on the Super Bowl than any other single event that is sporting of horse race. Exactly how much was bet over the 50 years during the unofficial vacation is impossible to share with because no body is keeping tabs on those Super Bowl squares you’re playing among friends.

But certainly, because the Super that is first Bowl 1967, numerous billions of bucks have already been risked on the upshot of the NFL title game. Last year’s matchup between the New England Patriots and Seattle Seahawks received $115.9 million in legal bets at Nevada sports books.

Horse race, that is commonly legal throughout much of the United States, regularly eclipses the Super Bowl with all the Kentucky Derby. Nevertheless, thanks to the excitement and hysteria of the prospective Triple Crown winner, the other two legs have now come near to surpassing football’s game that is biggest in recent years as well.

In 2014, California Chrome’s potential history-making run at the Belmont Stakes garnered $90 million in bets. 12 months later on, Americans were a little less enthused, but still wagered $81.6 million as American Pharoah made history in Long Island.

Football Still King

The reality is that football dominates the black and illegal wagering markets while on paper horse racing annually attracts more legal bets. The American Gaming Association (AGA) estimates that $95 billion has been bet regarding the 2015 college and NFL football seasons.

$3.8 billion was wagered illicitly on last year’s Super Bowl according to the video gaming advocacy organization, 38 times significantly more than legal bets. ‘It’s clear that a federal ban on traditional sports betting outside of Nevada is failing,’ AGA CEO Geoff Freeman said last fall.

Legalizing such a robust market would offer an untold amount of millions for states wanting to provide a regulated, activities market that is betting. Unfortunately for sports fans looking to place several dollars with their favorite group, that will not take place with no consent of Congress.

Sistema de enlaces para Becarios ERASMUS de la Delegación de la Unión Europea en Guatemala, Guatemala 2018 | Todos los derechos reservados. 

Esta es una plataforma de trabajo creada en conjunto para el uso e intercambio de información del programa de Becas Erasmus de la UE en Guatemala y la Delegación de la UE en Guatemala. No es un sitio oficial de la UE. Los intercambios de información en esta plataforma no sustituyen las comunicaciones oficiales vía electrónica  como aprobaciones, validaciones, invitaciones oficiales o cualquier otra coordinación para la cual deben utilizarse siempre los correos electrónicos oficiales provistos por la Delegación de la UE en Guatemala.

Políticas de uso del sitio ERASMUS InteractUE

Unión Europea cumple con los requisitos legales y de transparencia

En todas las acciones (proyectos, programas, etc) es de vital importancia que se cumpla con requisitos legales y de transparencia. Todo material producto de las actividades de comunicación que realicen los proyectos o programas deben de realizarse en estrecha coordinación con el oficial de prensa de la Delegación de la Unión Europea, quien es responsable de coordinar la estrategia general de comunicación de la UE en el país.

Todo material debe de respetar los aspectos relativos al derecho de propiedad intelectual, derecho de autor, etc. El derecho de autor implica el reconocimiento a través de la apropiada cita de la fuente, esto es aplicable a un texto, gráficas, imagen, fotografía, etc.

En la elaboración de materiales es importante incluir las siguientes cláusulas, según sea el caso:

  • Mención de la Unión Europea
  • Cláusula de exención de responsabilidades: “La presente publicación ha sido elaborada con la asistencia de la delegación de la Unión Europea de Guatemala, el contenido de la misma es responsabilidad exclusiva de [nombre de autor, contratista, socio ejecutivo u organización internacional” y en ningún caso debe considerarse que refleje los puntos de vista de la Unión Europea.
  • Copyright o derecho de autor.

Términos y Condiciones de Uso

El uso de la información subida a esta plataforma está supeditado estrictamente a las actividades de comunicación y visibilidad en el marco de la ejecución y socialización de los resultados, acciones e impacto –entre otros- de los programas y proyectos financiados por la UE en Guatemala. Los datos de los usuarios de la plataforma serán utilizados de manera exclusiva para esta plataforma.

INFORMACIÓN RELEVANTE

Es requisito necesario para la utilización de los servicios que se ofrecen en este sitio, que lea y acepte los siguientes Términos y Condiciones que a continuación se redactan. El uso de nuestros servicios implicará que usted ha leído y aceptado los Términos y Condiciones de Uso en el presente documento. Todos los servicios que son ofrecidos por nuestro sitio web pudieran ser enviados o presentados por una página web tercera y en tal caso estarían sujetas a sus propios Términos y Condiciones. En algunos casos, para accesar a los servicios de esta plataforma, será necesario el registro por parte del usuario, con ingreso de datos personales fidedignos y definición de una contraseña.

El usuario puede elegir y cambiar la clave para su acceso de administración de la cuenta en cualquier momento, en caso de que se haya registrado y que sea necesario para la compra de alguno de nuestros productos. La plataforma de InteractUE no asume la responsabilidad en caso de que entregue dicha clave a terceros.

LICENCIA

InteractUE a través de su sitio web concede una licencia para que los usuarios utilicen los servicios que son vendidos en este sitio web de acuerdo a los Términos y Condiciones que se describen en este documento.

USO NO AUTORIZADO

En caso de que aplique usted no puede colocar uno de nuestros elementos digitales, modificado o sin modificar, en un CD, sitio web o ningún otro medio y ofrecerlos para la redistribución o la reventa de ningún tipo.

PROPIEDAD

Usted no puede declarar propiedad intelectual o exclusiva a ninguno de nuestros servicios, modificado o sin modificar. Todos los servicios son propiedad de los proveedores del contenido. En caso de que no se especifique lo contrario, nuestros servicios se proporcionan sin ningún tipo de garantía, expresa o implícita. En ningún momento esta delegación será responsable de ningún daño incluyendo, pero no limitado a, daños directos, indirectos, especiales, fortuitos o consecuentes u otras pérdidas resultantes del uso o de la imposibilidad de utilizar nuestros elementos digitales o servicios proporcionados en la plataforma.

PRIVACIDAD

Este sitio web InteractUE garantiza que la información personal que usted envía cuenta con la seguridad necesaria. Los datos ingresados por usuario o en el caso de requerir una validación de los pedidos no serán entregados a terceros, salvo que deba ser revelada en cumplimiento a una orden judicial o requerimientos legales.

La suscripción a boletines de correos electrónicos publicitarios es voluntaria y podría ser seleccionada al momento de crear su cuenta.

La plataforma de InteractUE se reserva los derechos de cambiar o de modificar estos términos sin previo aviso.