Whelan <span id="more-2373"></span>And Lesniak Attack RAWA As Hearing Snowed Out

Senator Jim Whelan, who along side Senator Ray Lesniak has called on New Jersey’s media to fight RAWA.

New Jersey Senators Jim Whelan and Ray Lesniak have actually launched a blistering attack on the Restoration of America’s Wire Act.

The Senators sent a communication to New Jersey media outlets in a attempt to drum up opposition to the gambling that is anti-online, which was due to receive a Congressional hearing today (March 5).

The meeting has been postponed due to severe weather conditions in Washington DC.

‘ This legislation will take tens of huge amount of money from Atlantic City’s casinos at a time when it requires more revenue, not less,’ the Senators penned.

‘Not only would this bill do nothing to curb illegal online gaming, it could push dangerous black colored market vendors further into the shadows, placing adult customers and children at even greater risk.

‘ In fact, top way to deter dangerous criminal activity, including fraud, money laundering and terrorist financing, is to establish a well-regulated online video gaming industry like the ones that have been implemented in nj, Delaware and Nevada, also like in many other jurisdictions in North America and around the globe.’

Witnesses Largely Opposed to Online Gaming

RAWA, which had been reintroduced to the home by Representative Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) in January desires to prohibit all online gambling at a federal level, apart from horseracing and fantasy sports. No exemption would be made for states like New Jersey that have actually chosen to legalize and regulvate gaming that is online their borders or for the states that have actually adopted some form of internet lottery ticket sales.

Specifically, RAWA wants to overturn the 2011 opinion that is legal the Department of Justice, which asserted that the Wire Act prohibited only sports wagering on the internet. This effectively opened the hinged door to the state-by-state regulation of on-line poker and casino games.

The hearing that is forthcoming been criticized after having a list of witnesses due to testify was leaked towards the press, revealing it to be comprised largely of online gaming opponents.

Leave it to the States

‘Congress has spoken on this presssing issue,’ complained Whelan and Lesniak. ‘A federal ban on online video gaming would reverse current legislation, which recognizes that horse racing, fantasy sports and intrastate authorized gaming and lotteries are not subject to restrictions set forth by Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006.

‘ We believe strongly that gambling policy is best left towards the states to determine, which has been the truth throughout our nation’s history, and that New Jersey’s Internet video gaming policy should be dependant on the citizens of New Jersey.’

Despite the hearing, RAWA continues to be a piece that is unpopular of on Capitol Hill. The perception that Sheldon Adelson is strings that are pulling the scenes means it smacks of cronyism, while its determination to interfere with state’s rights has alienated much of the Republican Party. Democrats, meanwhile, are unlikely to be seen to side with Adelson on this kind of issue that is contentious.

NJ Sports Betting Could Become Legalized For March Madness

The usa Third District Court of Appeals will hear a NJ sports law that is betting March seventeenth that may result in Garden State residents being allowed to place money on the NCAA tournament. (Image: torrosports.com)

NJ sports betting ended up being signed into legislation final October by Governor Chris Christie just become blocked by a US district judge a month later who ruled the legislation violated a ban that is federal sports wagering.

Garden State lawmakers and Gov. Christie have asked the US Court of Appeals, Third Circuit, to vacate the decision.

The March 17th appeal will be heard by three federal judges, two who come with a particular amount of notoriety.

Maryanne Trump Barry, older sister to Donald Trump, and Marjorie Rendell, wife of previous Pennsylvania Governor Ed Rendell, will join Julio Fuentes in presiding on the case.

Sports vs. Christie

State Senate Bill 2460 repeals gambling prohibitions on expert, collegiate, and sporting that is amateur athletic occasions, allowing NJ’s casinos and horse racing tracks to efficiently operate as bookmakers. The NCAA, in association with MLB, NBA, NHL, and NFL, collectively sued citing the statutory legislation undermines the integrity of their leagues and competitions.

US District Judge Michael Shipp oversaw the litigation final fall and sided with the activities leagues, saying the legislation violated the federal government’s ban on all sports wagering except in Nevada, Delaware, Montana, and Oregon.

Of course, that didn’t stop lawmakers in Trenton from continuing their fight for legalization. ‘ The impact that is economic sports wagering can have on brand New Jersey is way too important to simply shrug our shoulders and move on,’ State Senate President Stephen Sweeney (D-Gloucester) said following the ruling in November.

The bill, introduced and authored by NJ State Sen. Ray Lesniak (D-Union), probably the nation’s biggest online gambling ally, said of the senate’s appeal, ‘we are simply following their lead. We will certainly have better possibility before the Third Circuit than we had before Judge Shipp.’ Lesniak’s remarks referenced Shipp’s relationship to his bro Marcel Shipp, a previous professional NFL running back.

March Madness

The three-judge panel seems to favor lawmakers in New Jersey, at least on paper. Former PA Governor Ed Rendell can be an adamant supporter of gambling. During his two terms, he brought the Keystone State legalized land-based gambling enterprises to their commonwealth that previously only offered horse race and a state-run lottery.

He’s long touted the impacts that are positive can yield, so it shouldn’t be unreasonable to think about his jobs have at least partially influenced his wife’s. To add icing on the cake, Rendell is an adamant Philadelphia recreations fan.

Although he’s sold off his casinos in Atlantic City, Donald Trump’s presence is still felt. During his three-decade participation in gambling, Trump was a proponent that is outspoken sports wagering. Into the 1990s, he also said legalizing activities betting was ‘vital to keeping your taxes low,’ an argument few in the Garden State could disagree with today thinking about the property that is enormous state, and regional earnings tax rates currently being levied.

Maryanne Trump Barry is nine years his senior, but that doesn’t mean she’s gotn’t been persuaded by her ‘little bro.’

Should the three judges overturn Shipp’s decision, the law may potentially become enacted just in time for the NCAA baseball tournament. The hearing will just take place two times before your bracket begins to crumble.

Miccarelli Resurrects Pennsylvania Poker-Only Online Gambling Bill

Representative Nick Miccarelli resubmits his poker-only online gambling bill that is identical to final year’s, and there isn’t any room for bad actors. (Image: politicspa.com)

Pennsylvania’s efforts to legalize poker that is online gaining vapor with the introduction of a second poker bill to mention legislature in as many weeks.

State Representative Nick Miccarelli submitted their poker-only online gambling bill (HB 695) this week, which is understood to be identical to the bill he delivered year that is last.

This one is unflinching titanic slot game free online in its bad actor language unlike the bill introduced last week by State Representative John D Payne. Miccarelli vows to ‘exclude those who violated the illegal online Gambling Enforcement Act (UIGEA) of 2006.’

No Wriggle Room for PokerStars

With an one-off licensing fee of $5 million, HB 695 proposes a 14 percent tax levy on gross gaming revenue, as does Payne’s bill.

This will be higher than Nevada’s but lower than neighboring brand New Jersey, although with a notably larger population Pennsylvania would be hoping for a higher taxation yield.

‘Poker is unlike banking games in many respects which make it best for the introduction of interactive gaming,’ Miccarelli told House Members. ‘Poker operators aren’t individuals in the games and are indifferent as towards the result.

‘Additionally, numerous Pennsylvania residents participate in illegal and poker that is unregulated. Establishing a very good regulatory framework under the Gaming Control Board will help in shutting down these illegal sites and enhance consumer protection for our video gaming residents.’

Miccarelli’s bill proposes that new operators is required to partner with existing license holders to be able to offer on-line poker in hawaii, which can be also the way it is in New Jersey, but unlike New Jersey there would be no third-party brands allowed, an idea that is not likely to please prospective entrants to the market.

The writing of the 2014 bill stated: ‘To ensure that real control and supervision continues to be with the entity that is licensed the licensed entity’s publicly available Internet website or similar public portal must be marketed and distributed around people underneath the licensed entity’s own name and brand and not the brands of third events.’

No Player Pool Sharing

Unlike Payne’s bill, HB 695 does perhaps not include language for the negotiation that is possible of liquidity sharing compacts, which perhaps betrays a lack of foresight; the newly regulated areas somewhere else in the US are desperate to initiate liquidity-sharing, because they struggle with disappointing revenue figures.

The Payne bill, meanwhile, needed to be amended this week as it was found that the ‘printer’s error’ had caused confusion over a point that is somewhat integral. The definition of the ‘authorized games’ that the bill would be regulating had been defined in the original text as ‘any interactive poker game authorized by the board under this chapter.’

This had lead most of us to think that this, too, was a poker-only bill. Clarification through the Payne’s workplace, however, has verified his legislation is seeking to modify casino and poker.

Sistema de enlaces para Becarios ERASMUS de la Delegación de la Unión Europea en Guatemala, Guatemala 2018 | Todos los derechos reservados. 

Esta es una plataforma de trabajo creada en conjunto para el uso e intercambio de información del programa de Becas Erasmus de la UE en Guatemala y la Delegación de la UE en Guatemala. No es un sitio oficial de la UE. Los intercambios de información en esta plataforma no sustituyen las comunicaciones oficiales vía electrónica  como aprobaciones, validaciones, invitaciones oficiales o cualquier otra coordinación para la cual deben utilizarse siempre los correos electrónicos oficiales provistos por la Delegación de la UE en Guatemala.

Políticas de uso del sitio ERASMUS InteractUE

Unión Europea cumple con los requisitos legales y de transparencia

En todas las acciones (proyectos, programas, etc) es de vital importancia que se cumpla con requisitos legales y de transparencia. Todo material producto de las actividades de comunicación que realicen los proyectos o programas deben de realizarse en estrecha coordinación con el oficial de prensa de la Delegación de la Unión Europea, quien es responsable de coordinar la estrategia general de comunicación de la UE en el país.

Todo material debe de respetar los aspectos relativos al derecho de propiedad intelectual, derecho de autor, etc. El derecho de autor implica el reconocimiento a través de la apropiada cita de la fuente, esto es aplicable a un texto, gráficas, imagen, fotografía, etc.

En la elaboración de materiales es importante incluir las siguientes cláusulas, según sea el caso:

  • Mención de la Unión Europea
  • Cláusula de exención de responsabilidades: “La presente publicación ha sido elaborada con la asistencia de la delegación de la Unión Europea de Guatemala, el contenido de la misma es responsabilidad exclusiva de [nombre de autor, contratista, socio ejecutivo u organización internacional” y en ningún caso debe considerarse que refleje los puntos de vista de la Unión Europea.
  • Copyright o derecho de autor.

Términos y Condiciones de Uso

El uso de la información subida a esta plataforma está supeditado estrictamente a las actividades de comunicación y visibilidad en el marco de la ejecución y socialización de los resultados, acciones e impacto –entre otros- de los programas y proyectos financiados por la UE en Guatemala. Los datos de los usuarios de la plataforma serán utilizados de manera exclusiva para esta plataforma.

INFORMACIÓN RELEVANTE

Es requisito necesario para la utilización de los servicios que se ofrecen en este sitio, que lea y acepte los siguientes Términos y Condiciones que a continuación se redactan. El uso de nuestros servicios implicará que usted ha leído y aceptado los Términos y Condiciones de Uso en el presente documento. Todos los servicios que son ofrecidos por nuestro sitio web pudieran ser enviados o presentados por una página web tercera y en tal caso estarían sujetas a sus propios Términos y Condiciones. En algunos casos, para accesar a los servicios de esta plataforma, será necesario el registro por parte del usuario, con ingreso de datos personales fidedignos y definición de una contraseña.

El usuario puede elegir y cambiar la clave para su acceso de administración de la cuenta en cualquier momento, en caso de que se haya registrado y que sea necesario para la compra de alguno de nuestros productos. La plataforma de InteractUE no asume la responsabilidad en caso de que entregue dicha clave a terceros.

LICENCIA

InteractUE a través de su sitio web concede una licencia para que los usuarios utilicen los servicios que son vendidos en este sitio web de acuerdo a los Términos y Condiciones que se describen en este documento.

USO NO AUTORIZADO

En caso de que aplique usted no puede colocar uno de nuestros elementos digitales, modificado o sin modificar, en un CD, sitio web o ningún otro medio y ofrecerlos para la redistribución o la reventa de ningún tipo.

PROPIEDAD

Usted no puede declarar propiedad intelectual o exclusiva a ninguno de nuestros servicios, modificado o sin modificar. Todos los servicios son propiedad de los proveedores del contenido. En caso de que no se especifique lo contrario, nuestros servicios se proporcionan sin ningún tipo de garantía, expresa o implícita. En ningún momento esta delegación será responsable de ningún daño incluyendo, pero no limitado a, daños directos, indirectos, especiales, fortuitos o consecuentes u otras pérdidas resultantes del uso o de la imposibilidad de utilizar nuestros elementos digitales o servicios proporcionados en la plataforma.

PRIVACIDAD

Este sitio web InteractUE garantiza que la información personal que usted envía cuenta con la seguridad necesaria. Los datos ingresados por usuario o en el caso de requerir una validación de los pedidos no serán entregados a terceros, salvo que deba ser revelada en cumplimiento a una orden judicial o requerimientos legales.

La suscripción a boletines de correos electrónicos publicitarios es voluntaria y podría ser seleccionada al momento de crear su cuenta.

La plataforma de InteractUE se reserva los derechos de cambiar o de modificar estos términos sin previo aviso.